Agriculture, Environment & Society

Agriculture, Environment & Society

Evaluation of sustainability of rainfed rapeseed production in Gorgan county using Emergy analysis

Document Type : Original research article

Authors
1 M.Sc. Graduated of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran
2 Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Plant Production, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources (GUASNR), Gorgan, Iran
Abstract
Excessive use of environmental resources and excessive consumption of chemicals have exacerbated environmental problems and harmed agroecosystem sustainability. As a result, it is beneficial to study energy consumption patterns and efficient energy use in agriculture, which is one of the fundamental principles of sustainable agriculture. The aim of this study was to assess the sustainability of rapeseed production (Brassica napus L.) in Gorgan county during the 2017-2018 crop year using emergy essessment. Sixty questionnaires were considered for this purpose. After establishing spatial and temporal boundaries and classifying resources into four categories: renewable environment, non-renewable environment, purchased renewable, and purchased non-renewable, and some emergy indices were calculated in rapeseed agroecosystems. The results indicated that the total emergy input for the rapeseed agroecosystems consumed a total of 6.39E+15 sej ha-1 yr-1. In rapeseed agroecosystems, dependence on market and non-renewable inputs was much higher than environmental and renewable inputs. With 59.94 percent of total emergy input in rapeseed agroecosystems, fossil fuels were the primary source of emergy. The transformity of rapeseed agroecosystems was 1.09E+05 sej J-1, the specific emergy was 3.09E+09 sej gr-1, the renewability was 12.46 percent, the emergy yield ratio was 1.22, the standard emergy investment ratio was 4.56, the modified emergy investment ratio was 9.23, the standard environmental loading ratio was 10.25, the modified environmental loading ratio was 7.02, the standard emergy sustainability index was 0.12, and the modified emergy sustainability index was 0.17. Based on the evaluation of emergy indices, the rapeseed agroecosystem has an acceptable crop production efficiency and resource consumption efficiency, and a significant potential for economic productivity increase. By implementing conservation tillage and modernizing machinery, will reduce our reliance on non-renewable and economic inputs, alleviate environmental pressure, and increase the agroecosystem's sustainability.

Highlights

  • The purpose of this study was to assess the sustainability of rapeseed production in Gorgan county in 2017-2018.
  • Agroecosystem emergy indices were calculated in rapeseed agroecosystems.
  • The rapeseed agroecosystems consumed 6.39E+15 sej ha-1 yr-1.
  • Rapeseed agroecosystems had Tr of 1.09E+05 sej J-1, SpE of 3.09E+09 sej gr-1, EYR of 1.22, EIR of 4.56, ELR of 10.25, and ESI of 0.12.
  • With acceptable crop production and resource consumption efficiency, the rapeseed agroecosystem has a significant potential for economic productivity growth.

Keywords

Amiri, Z., Asgharipour, M.R., Campbell, D.E., Aghapoor Sabaghi, M. 2020. Comparison of the sustainability of mechanized and traditional rapeseed production systems using an emergy-based production function: A case study in Lorestan Province, Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production 258, 120891.
Amiri, Z., Asgharipour, M.R., Campbell, D.E., Armin, M. 2019. A sustainability analysis of two rapeseed farming ecosystems in Khorramabad, Iran, based on emergy and economic analyses. Journal of Cleaner Production 226, 1051-1066.
Amiri, Z., Asgharipour, M.R., Campbell, D.E., Azizi, K., Kakolvand, E., Hassani Moghadam, E. 2021. Conservation agriculture, a selective model based on emergy analysis for sustainable production of shallot as a medicinal-industrial plant. Journal of Cleaner Production 292, 126000.
Asgharipour, M.R., Amiri, Z., Campbell, D.E. 2020. Evaluation of the sustainability of four greenhouse vegetable production ecosystems based on an analysis of emergy and social characteristics. Ecological Modelling 424, 109021.
Asgharipour, M.R., Shahgholi, H., Campbell, D.E., Khamari, I., Ghadiri, A. 2019. Comparison of the sustainability of bean production systems based on emergy and economic analyses. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 191(2), 1-21.
Bastianoni, S., Marchettini, N., Panzieri, M., Tiezzi, E. 2001. Sustainability assessment of a farm in the Chianti area (Italy). Journal of Cleaner Production 9, 365-373.
Brandt-Williams, S.L. 2002. Handbook of Emergy Evaluation: Folio #4 Emergy of Florida Agriculture. Center for Environmental Policy, Univercity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Brown, M.T., Campbell, D.E., De Vilbiss, C., Ulgiati, S. 2016. The geobiosphere emergy baseline: A synthesis. Ecological Modelling 339, 92-95.
Brown, M.T., Ulgiati, S. 2004. Energy quality, emergy, and transformity: H.T. Odum,s contributions to quantifying and understanding systems. Ecological Modelling 178, 201-213.
Campbell, D.E., Brandt-Williams, S.L., Meisch, M.E.A. 2005. Environmental accounting using Emergy: Evaluation of the state of West Virginia. EPA/600/R-02/011. USEPA, Office of research and Development, Washigton, DC, P. 116.
Campbell, D.E., Laherrere, J. 1998. The end of cheap oil. American Journal of Science 278(3), 78-83.
Cochran, J. 2003. Patterns of sustainable agriculture adoption/non-adoption in Panama a thesis submitted to McGill University. McGill University, Montreal, Canad, 1-114.
Ghaley, B.B., Kehli, N., Mentler, A. 2018. Emergy synthesis of conventional fodder maize (Zea mays L.) production in Denmark. Ecological Indicators 87, 144-151.
Ghisellini, P., Zucaro, A., Viglia, S., Ulgiati, S. 2014. Monitoring and evaluating the sustainability of Italian agricultural system. An emergy decomposition analysis. Ecological Modelling 271, 132-148.
Houshyar, E., Wu, X.F., Chen, G.Q. 2018. Sustainability of wheat and maize production in the warm climate of southwestern Iran: An emergy analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 2246-2255.
Jafari, M., Asgharipour, M.R., Ramroudi, M., Galavi, M., Hadarbadi, G. 2018. Sustainability assessment of date and pistachio agricultural systems using energy, emergy and economic approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production 193, 642-651.
Kazemi, H., Hassanpour Bourkheili, S., Kamkar, B., Soltani, A., Gharanjic, K., Nazari, N.M. 2016. Estimation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission and energy use efficiency (EUE) analysis in rainfed rapeseed production (case study: Golestan province, Iran). Energy 116, 694-700.
Kumaraswamy, S. 2012. Sustainability issues in agro-ecology: Socio-ecological perspective. Agricultural Sciences 3(2), 153-169.
Lu, H., Bai, Y., Ren, H., Campbell, D.E. 2010. Integrated emergy, energy and economic evaluation of rice and vegetable production systems in alluvial paddy fields: Implications for agricultural policy in China. Journal of Environmental Management 91, 2727-2735.
Lu, H.F., Kang, W.L., Campbell, D.E., Ren, H., Tand, Y.W., Fengd, R.X., Luo, J.T., Chen, F.P. 2009. Emergy and economic evaluations of four fruit production systems on reclaimed wetlands surrounding the Pearl River Estuary, China. Ecological Engineering 35, 1743-1757.
Lu, H., Yuan, Y., Campbell, D.E., Qin, P., Cui, L. 2014. Integrated water quality, emergy and economic evaluation of three bioremediation treatment systems for eutrophic water. Ecological Engineering 69, 244-254.
Martin, J.F., Diemont, S.A.W., Powell, E., Stanton, M., Levy-Tacher, S. 2006. Emergy evaluation of the performance and sustainability of three agricultural systems with different scales and management. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 115, 128-140.
Odum, H.T. 1996. Environmental accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making. John Wiley & Sons, New York. USA.
Odum, H.T. 2000. Handbook of Emergy Evaluation. A Compendium of Data for Emergy Computation Folio #2 Emergy global processes. Center of Environmental Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Patterson, M., McDonald, G., Hardy, D. 2017. Is there more in common than we think? Convergence of ecological footprinting, emergy analysis, life cycle assessment and other methods of environmental accounting. Ecological Modelling 362, 19-36.
Quintero-Angel, M., Gonzalez-Acevedo, A. 2018. Tendencies and challenges for the assessment of agricultural sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 254, 273-281.
Rajabi Hamedani, S., Shahabi, Z., Rafiee, Sh. 2011. Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in potato production in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy 36, 2367-2371.
Shahhoseini, H.R., Ramroudi, M., Kazemi, H. 2020. Evaluating the resources use efficiency and sustainability indices for two potato production systems using emergy analysis (Case Study: Gorgan county). Journal of Agroecology 12(1), 127-142. (In Persian with English Summary).
Ulgiati, S., Brown, M.T. 1998. Monitoring patterns of sustainability in natural and man-made ecosystems. Ecological Modelling 108, 23-36.
Ulgiati, S., Brown, M.T. 2002. Quantifying the environmental support for dilution and abatement of process emissions. The case of electricity production. Journal of Cleaner Production 10, 335-348.
Wang, X., Dadouma, A., Chen, Y., Sui, P., Gao, W., Qin, F., Zhang, J., Xia, W. 2014. Emergy analysis of grain production systems on large-scale farms in the North China Plain based on LCA. Agricultural Systems 128, 66–78.
Xi, Y.G., Qin, P. 2009. Emergy evaluation of organic rice-duck mutualism system. Ecological Engineering 35, 1677-1683.
Yasini, H., Ghanbari, S.A., Asgharipour, M.R., Seyedabadi, E. 2020. Evaluation of Sustainability in Wheat, Onion and Garlic Cropping Systems by Joint Use of Emergy and Economic Accounting. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 30(2), 269-288. (In Persian with English Summary).
Zhai, X., Huang, D., Tang, S., Li, S., Guo, J., Yang, Y., Liu, H., Li, J., Wang, K. 2017. The emergy of metabolism in different ecosystems under the same environmental conditions in the agro-pastoral ecotone of northern China. Ecological Indicators 74, 198-204.
Zhang, L.X., Song, B., Chen, B. 2012. Emergy-based analysis of four farming systems: insight into agricultural diversification in rural China. Journal of Cleaner Production 28, 33–44.

  • Receive Date 11 April 2022
  • Revise Date 07 May 2022
  • Accept Date 08 May 2022