Agriculture, Environment & Society

Agriculture, Environment & Society

Simulating spring wheat growth under simultaneous salinity and water stress using the AquaCrop model

Document Type : Original research article

Authors
1 PhD graduate, Water Science and Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, ‎Mashhad, Iran
2 Department of Water Sciences and Engineering, Kashmar Higher Education Institute, Kashmar, Iran
Abstract
Crop growth simulation models are developed to predict the effects of different factors, including water and salinity on grain, biomass yields, and water efficiency of various crops. These models are typically calibrated and validated for specific regions based on the availability of measured field data. In this research, spring wheat growth under simultaneous salinity and water stress was Simulated using the AquaCrop model. Calibration and validation were conducted using data from 2010 and 2011, respectively. Results indicate that AquaCrop accurately simulated spring wheat yield, biomass, water use efficiency, and harvest index under salinity and water-limiting conditions. The simulation of harvest index and soil salinity profiles was less precise compared to other characteristics. The mean values of NRMSE, ME, d, CRM, and R2 for grain yield were 13.3%, 36.1%, 0.95, -0.072, and 0.87, respectively in both calibration and verification. For biomass, these measures were 12.59%, 34.46%, 0.92, 0.057, and 0.77, separately. The corresponding values for the soil moisture profile were 11.84%, 25.72%, 0.93, and 0.032, while for the soil salinity profile, they were 26.25%, 58.5%, 0.91, and -0.12, respectively. The most sensitive parameters included the crop transpiration coefficient, normalized crop water productivity, reference harvest index, volumetric water content at field capacity, soil water content at saturation, and temperature.

Highlights

  • The AquaCrop model accurately simulated spring wheat yield, biomass, and water use efficiency, under salinity and water stress conditions.
  • The model was sensitive to parameters like crop transpiration coefficient, and normalized crop water productivity, at field capacity and saturation.
  • The model's simulation of soil salinity was less precise compared to other variables.
  • AquaCrop's evaluation was based on two years of field data and demonstrated its applicability for analyzing and forecasting salinity and water stress in spring wheat.
  • The model's simplicity requirements make it suitable for evaluating various irrigation scenarios and optimizing water usage in spring wheat cultivation.

Keywords

Abedinpour, M., Sarangi, A., Rajput, T. B. S., Singhb, M., Pathak, H., & Ahmad, T. (2012). Performance evaluation of AquaCrop model for maize crop in a semi-arid environment. Agricultural Water Management, 110, 55-66. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.04.001.
Andarzian, B., Bannayan, M., Steduto, P., Mazraeh, H., Barati, M. E., Barati, M. A., & Rahnama, A. (2011). Validation and testing of the AquaCrop model under full and deficit irrigated wheat production in Iran. Agricultural Water Management, 100(1), 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.08.023.
Cao, Y., & Petzold, L. (2006). Accuracy limitations and the measurement of errors in the stochastic simulation of chemically reacting systems. Journal of Computational Physics, 212(1), 6-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.06.012.
Dehghanisanji, H., Nakhjavani, M. M., Zeggaf-Tahiri, A., & Anyoji, H. (2009). Assessment of wheat and maize water productivities and production function for cropping system decisions in arid and semiarid reigns. Irrigation and Drainage, 58(1), 105-115. doi: 10.1002/ird.397.
Dominguez, A., Tarjuelo, J. M., Juan, J. A., Lopez-Mata, E., Breidy, J., & Karam, F. (2011). Deficit irrigation under water stress and salinity conditions: The MOPECO -salt model. Agricultural Water Management, 98(9), 1451-1461. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.04.015.
Garcia­Vila, M., Fereres, E., Mateos, L., Orgaz, F., & Steduto, P. (2009). Defcit irrigation optimization of cotton with AquaCrop. Agronomy Journal, 101(3), 477-487.  doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0179s
Geerts, S., Raes, D., Garcia, M., Miranda, R., Cusicanqui, J. A., Taboada, C., . . . Steduto, P. (2009). Simulating yield response of quinoa to water availability with AquaCrop. Agronomy Journal, 101(3), 499-508. doi: 10.2134/agronj2008.0137s.
Gowing, J. W., Rose, D. A., & Ghamarni, H. (2009). The effect of salinity on water productivity of wheat under deficit irrigation above shallow groundwater. Agricultural Water Management, 96(3), 517-524. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2008.09.024.
Haghverdi, A., Ghahraman, B., Lei, B. G., Pulido-Calvo, I., Ka, M., Davary, K., & Ashorun, B. (2014). Deriving data mining and regression-based water-salinity production functions for spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 101, 68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2013.12.009.
Heng, L. K., Hsiao, T. C., Evett, S., Howell, T., & Steduto, P. (2009). Validating the fao AquaCrop model for irrigated and water deficient field maize. Agronomy Journal, 101(3), 488-498. doi: 10.2134/agronj2008.0029xs.
Homaee, M., Feddes, R. A., & Dirksen, C. (2002). Simulation of root and water uptake: III. Nonuniform transient combined salinity and water stress. Agricultural Water Management, 57(2), 127-144. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00073-2.
Hussein, F., Janat, M., & Yakoub, A. (2011). Simulating cotton yield response to deficit irrigation with the fao AquaCrop model. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 9, 1319-1330. doi: 10.5424/sjar/20110904-358-10
Pereira, L. S., Paredes, P., Сholpankulov, E. D., Inchenkova, O. P., Teodoro, P. R., & Horst, M. G. (2009). Irrigation scheduling strategies for cotton to cope with water scarcity in the Fergana Valley, Central Asia. Agricultural Water Management, 96(5), 723-735. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2008.10.013
Jamieson, P. D., Porter, J. R., & Wilson, D. R. (1991). A test of computer simulation model arc-wheat1 on wheat crops grown in new zealand. Field crops research, 27(4), 337-350. doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(91)90040-3.
Jiang, j., Feng, S., Huo, Z., Zhao, Z., & Jia, B. (2011). Application of the SWAP model to simulate water-salt transport under deficit irrigation with saline water. Agricultural Water Management, 54(3-4), 902-911. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.11.014.
Jones, C. A., & Kiniry, J. R. (1986). Ceres-n maize: A simulation model of maize growth and development. College Station, Temple, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
Kiani, R., & Abbasi, F. (2009). Assessment of the water-salinity crop production function of wheat using experimental data of the Golestan province, Iran. Irrigation and Drainage, 58(4), 445-455. doi: 10.1002/ird.438.
Kumar, P., Sarangi, A., Singh, D. K., & Parihar, S. S. (2014). Evaluation of AquaCrop model in predicting wheat yield and productivity under irrigated saline regimes. Irrigation and Drainage, 63(4), 474-487. doi: 10.1002/ird.1841.
Kumar, P., Sarangi, A., Singh, D. K., Parihar, S. S., & Sahoo, R. N. (2015). Simulation of salt dynamics in the root zone and yield of wheat crop under irrigated saline regimes using SWAP model. Agricultural Water Management, 148, 72-83. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.09.014.
Lopez-Urrea, R., Montoro, A., González-Piqueras, J., Lopez-Fuster, P., & Fereres, E. (2009). Water use of spring wheat to raise water productivity. Agricultural Water Management, 96(9), 1305-1310. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.04.015.
Marinov, D., Querner, E., & Roelsma, J. (2005). Simulation of water flow and nitrogen transport for a bulgarian experimental plot using SWAP and ANIMO models. Journal of contaminant hydrology, 77(3), 145-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2004.12.004.
Mebane, V. J., Day, R. L., Hamlett, J. M., Watson, J. E., & Roth, G. W. (2013). Validating the fao AquaCrop model for rainfed maize in pennsylvania. Agronomy Journal, 105(2), 419-427. doi: 10.2134/agronj2012.0337.
Meyer, G. E., Curry, R. B., Streeter, J. G., & Baker, C. H. (1981). Simulation of reproductive processes and senescence in indeterminate soybeans. Transactions of the ASABE, 24(2), 421-429.
Mkhabela, M. S., & Bullock, P. R. (2012). Performance of the fao AquaCrop model for wheat grain yield and soil moisture simulation in western Canada. Agricultural Water Management, 110, 16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.03.009.
Liu, J., Wiberg, D., Zehnder, A. J., & Yang, H. (2007). Modeling the role of irrigation in winter wheat yield, crop water productivity, and production in China. Irrigation Science, 26, 21-33. doi: 10.1007/s00271-007-0069-9.
Mohammadi, M., Ghahraman, B., Davary, K., Ansari, H., Shahidi, A., & Bannayan, M. (2016). Nested validation of AquaCrop model for simulation of winter wheat grain yield, soil moisture and salinity profiles under simultaneous salinity and water stress. Irrigation and Drainage, 65(1), 112-128. doi: 10.1002/ird.1953.
Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2009). Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments (Third ed.). NewYork, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Nain, A. S., & Kersebaum, K. (2007). Calibration and validation of CERES-wheat model for simulating water and nutrients in Germany. In: Kersebaum, k.Ch., c(eds.), modeling water and nutrient dynamics in soil-crop systems (pp. 161-181): Springer.
Pereira, L. S., Oweis, T., & Zairi, A. (2002). Irrigation management under water scarcity. Agricultural Water Management, 57(3), 175-206. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00075-6.
Raes, D., Geerts, S., Kipkorir, E., Wellenss, J., & Sahli, A. (2006). Simulation of yield decline as result of water stress with a robust soil water balance model. Agricultural Water Management, 81(3), 335-357. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.04.006.
Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C., & Fereres, E. (2009a). AquaCrop-the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water. II. Main algorithms and software description. Agronomy Journal, 101(3), 438-447. doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0140s.
Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C., & Fereres, E. (2009b). AquaCrop-the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: Reference manual annexes. www.fao.org/nr/water/AquaCrop.html.
Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C., & Fereres, E. (2011). AquaCrop reference manual: Calculation procedures. http://www.fao.org/nr/water/docs/AquaCrop31/AquaCropV31Chapter3.pdf (accessed March 2012).
Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C., & Fereres, E. (2012). Reference manual AquaCrop version 4.0. Rome, Italy: FAO, Land and Water Division.
Salazar, O., Wesstrom, I., Youssef, M. A., Skaggs, R. W., & Joel, A. (2009). Evaluation of the DRAINMOD-N II model for predicting nitrogen losses in loamy sand under cultivation in southeast Sweden. Agricultural Water Management, 96(2), 267-281. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2008.08.008.
Salemi, H., Soom, M. A. M., Lee, T. S., Mousavi, S. F., Ganji, A., & KamilYusoff, M. (2011). Application of AquaCrop model in deficit irrigation management of winter wheat in arid region. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 610, 2204-2215. doi: 10.5897/ajar10.1009.
Shafiei, M., Ghahraman, B., Saghafian, B., Davary, K., Pande, S., & Vazifedoust, M. (2014). Uncertainty assessment of the agro-hydrological SWAP model application at field scale: A case study in a dry region. Agricultural Water Management, 146, 324-334. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.09.008.
Stockle, C. O., Donatelli, M., & Nelson, R. (2003). Cropsyst a cropping systems simulation model. European Journal of Agronomy, 18(3-4), 289-307. doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00109-0.
Todorovic, M., Albrizo, R., Zivotic, L., Saab, M. T. A., Stockle, C., & Steduto, P. (2009). Assessing AquaCrop, CropSyst and WOFOST models in the simulation of sunflower growth under different water regimes. Agronomy Journal, 101(3), 509-521. doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0166s.
Vanuytrecht, E., Raes, D., & Willems, P. (2011). Considering sink strength to model crop production under elevated atmospheric CO2. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 151(12), 1753-1762. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.07.011
Willmott, C. J. (1982). Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 63(11), 1309-1313.
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T., & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed research, 14, 415-421. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x

  • Receive Date 02 March 2023
  • Revise Date 02 May 2023
  • Accept Date 09 May 2023