Agriculture, Environment & Society

Agriculture, Environment & Society

The Effect of crop rotation on energy indices and greenhouse gas emissions in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum) dryland agroecosystems in Kermanshah region, Iran

Document Type : Original research article

Authors
1 M.Sc. student of Crop Ecology, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
2 Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
3 Razi Ph.D. Graduated of Crop Ecology, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
Abstract
The application of appropriate agricultural practices leads to savings in fuel consumption, energy, and a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, this research was conducted to compare wheat-chickpea crop rotation with wheat monoculture in terms of energy indices and amount of greenhouse gas emissions in dryland agroecosystems during 2021. The amounts of inputs consumed and all agricultural operations in the studied agroecosystems from planting to harvesting were calculated through questionnaires and energy analysis. Data analysis included three components: energy inputs, energy outputs, and global warming potential due to greenhouse gas emissions. The results indicated that total energy input for wheat-chickpea rotation and wheat monoculture was 13550.5 and 15106.8 Mj ha-1, respectively. The total energy output for wheat-chickpea rotation and wheat monoculture were 45802.5 and 41860.3 Mj ha-1, respectively. Energy use efficiency for wheat-chickpea rotation and wheat monoculture were 3.4 and 2.8, respectively. In wheat monoculture system, CO2 emission was about 184.9% higher than wheat-chickpea rotation, which were related to use of fossil fuel (59.2%), nitrogen fertilizer (30.8%), and phosphate fertilizer (7.4%). Nitrogen oxide emissions in wheat monoculture were higher than wheat-chickpea rotation. The global warming potential in wheat monoculture and wheat-chickpea rotation systems were 709.3 and 627.9 kg eq Co2 h-1, respectively. ​Overall, the results showed that wheat monoculture has lower energy efficiency and higher global warming potential compared to wheat-chickpea rotation. Therefore, to prevent further emission of greenhouse gases and combat climate change, wheat-chickpea crop rotation is recommended instead of wheat monoculture in dryland agroecosystems.     

Highlights

  • Wheat-chickpea rotation cuts energy input by 11% (13550.5 vs. 15106.8 MJ ha-1) vs. monoculture.
  • Energy efficiency rises 18% in rotation (3.4) over monoculture (2.8) in Kermanshah.
  • CO2 emissions 184.9% higher in monoculture due to fossil fuel and nitrogen use.
  • Rotation boosts energy output 9% (45802.5 vs. 41860.3 MJ ha-1) vs. monoculture.
  • GWP lower in rotation (627.9 kg CO2 eq ha-1) than monoculture (709.3 kg CO2 eq ha-1).

Keywords

Alluvione, F., Moretti, B., Sacco, D., & Grignani, C. (2011). EUE (energy use efficiency) of cropping systems for a sustainable agriculture. Energy, 36, 4468-4481. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.075
Bagherabadi, R. (2022). Investigation of climate change on the kermanshah city using the demartoune, ambrothermic and embereger in 1991-2021. Geography and human Relationships, 4(4), 173-185. [In Persian]. doi: doi: 20.1001.1.26453851.1401.4.4.12.4
Barton, L., Murphy, D. V., & Butterbach-Bahl, K. (2013). Influence of crop rotation and liming on greenhouse gas emissions from a semi-arid soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 167, 23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.01.003
Behnke, G. D., Zuber, S. M., Pittelkow, C. M., Nafziger, E. D., & Villamil, M. B. (2018). Long-term crop rotation and tillage effects on soil greenhouse gas emissions and crop production in illinois, USA. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 261, 62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.03.007
Brentrup, F., Küsters, J., Kuhlmann, H., & Lammel, J. (2004a). Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment methodology: I. Theoretical concept of a LCA method tailored to crop production. European Journal of Agronomy, 20(3), 247-264. doi: 10.1016/s1161-0301(03)00024-8
Brentrup, F., Küsters, J., Lammel, J., Barraclough, P., & Kuhlmann, H. (2004b). Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology ii. The application to N fertilizer use in winter wheat production systems. European Journal of Agronomy, 20(3), 265-279. doi: 10.1016/s1161-0301(03)00039-x
Energy the Balance Sheet. 2008. Available at Web site http://www.moe.gov.ir.
Feyzbakhsh, M. T., & Alizadeh, P. (2018). Comparison of silage corn (Zea mays L.) and forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) productions in terms of energy consumption and global warming potential in gorgan region. Journal of Agroecology, 10(1), 218-233. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22067/jag.v10i1.56517
Franszluebbers, A., Hons, F., & Saladino, V. (1995). Sorghum, wheat and soybean production as affected by long-term tillage, crop sequence and N fertilization. Plant and Soil, 173, 55-65. doi: 10.1007/bf00155518
Guardia, G., Tellez-Rio, A., García-Marco, S., Martin-Lammerding, D., Tenorio, J. L., Ibáñez, M. Á., & Vallejo, A. (2016). Effect of tillage and crop (cereal versus legume) on greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential in a non-irrigated mediterranean field. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 221, 187-197. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.01.047
Hoeppner, J. W., Entz, M. H., McConkey, B. G., Lafond, G. P., & Zentner, R. P. (2000). The role of forage legumes in reducing on-farm non-renewable energy use Soils and crops workshop.
Khakbazan, M., Mohr, R. M., Huang, J., Xie, R., Volkmar, K. M., Tomasiewicz, D. J., & Nelson, A. (2019). Effects of crop rotation on energy use efficiency of irrigated potato with cereals, canola, and alfalfa over a 14-year period in Manitoba, Canada. Soil and Tillage Research, 195, 104357. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2019.104357
Kizilaslan, H. (2009). Input–output energy analysis of cherries production in Tokat province of Turkey. Applied Energy, 86, 1354-1358. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.07.009
Lal, R. (2004). Carbon emission from farm operations. Environment International, 30(7), 981-990. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2004.03.005
Linzmeier, W., Gutser, R., & Schmidhalter, U. (2001). Nitrous oxide emission from soil and from a nitrogen 15-labelled fertilizer with the new nitrification inhibitor 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP).  Biology and Fertility of Soils, 34(2), 103-108. doi: 10.1007/s003740100383
Min, J., Lu, K., Sun, H., Xia, L., Zhang, H., & Shi, W. (2016). Global warming potential in an intensive vegetable cropping system as affected by crop rotation and nitrogen rate. Clean–Soil, Air, Water, 44(7), 766-774. doi: 10.1002/clen.201400785
Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture of Iran (MJA). 2022. Agricultural Jihad Organization of Kermanshah Province.
Mohammadi, A., Tabatabaeefar, A., Shahin, S., Rafiee, S., & Keyhani, A. (2008). Energy use and economical analysis of potato production in iran a case study: Ardabil province. Energy Conversion and Management, 49, 3566-3570.
Montemuro, F., Maiorana, M., Ferri, D., & Convertini, G. (2006). Nitrogen indicators, uptake and utilization efficiency in a maize and barley rotation cropped at different levels and source of N fertilization. Field Crops Research, 99, 114-124. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2006.04.001
Nasirian, N., Almasi, M., Minaee, S., & Bakhoda, H. (2006). Study of energy flow in sugarcane production in an agro-industry unit in south of Ahvaz Proceeding 4th national congress of agricultural machines. Tabriz, Iran, 11-14 March. [In Persian].
Nemecek, T., Richthofen, J. S., Dubois, G., Casta, P., Charles, R., & Pahl, H. (2008). Environmental impacts of introducing grain legumes into European crop rotations. European Journal of Agronomy, 28, 380-393. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2007.11.004
Ozkan, B., Akcaoz, H., & Karadeniz, F. (2004). Energy requirement and economic analysis of citrus production in Turkey. Energy Conversion Management, 45, 1821-1830. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2003.10.002
Rafiee, S., Avval, S. H. M., & Mohammadi, A. (2010). Modeling and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for apple production in Iran. Energy, 35(8), 3301-3306. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.015
Rezvantalab, N., Soltani, A., Zeinali, E., & Foroughinia, A. (2018). Study of energy indicators and greenhouse gas emissions in wheat production in Golestan province. Journal of Agroecology, 9(1), 17-38. [In Persian].
Safa, M., & Samarasinghe, S. (2012). Co2 emissions production in Canterbury, New Zealand. Environmental Pollution, 171, 126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.07.032
Sainju, U. M., Stevens, W. B., Caesar-TonThat, T., & Liebig, M. A. (2012). Soil greenhouse gas emissions affected by irrigation, tillage, crop rotation, and nitrogen fertilization. Journal of environmental quality, 41(6), 1774-1786. doi: 10.2134/jeq2012.0176
Sefeedpari, P., Shokoohi, Z., & Behzadifar, Y. (2014). Energy use and carbon dioxide emission analysis in sugarcane farms: A survey on Haft-Tappeh Sugarcane Agro-Industrial company in Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 83, 212-219. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.048
Singh, G., Singh, S., & Singh, J. (2004). Optimization of energy inputs for wheat crop in Punjab. Energy Conversion and Management, 45(3), 453-465. doi: 10.1016/s0196-8904(03)00155-9
Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1989). Statistical methods, 8th Edn: Iowa State University Press.
Snyder, C. S., Bruulsema, T. W., Jensen, T. L., & Fixen, P. E. (2009). Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 133, 247-266. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.021
Soltani, A., Rajabi, M. H., Zeinali, E., & Soltani, E. (2010). Evaluation of environmental impact of crop production using LCA: Wheat in Gorgan. Crop Production, 3(3), 201-218. dor: 20.1001.1.2008739.1389.3.3.12.1
Yaldiz, O., Ozturk, H. H., Zeren, Y., & Bascetincelik, A. 1993. Energy usage in production of field crops in Turkey. In: 5th International Congress on Mechanisation and Energy Use in Agriculture, October., Kusadas, Turkey, pp. 11-14
Volume 4, Issue 2 - Serial Number 7
December 2024
Pages 67-74

  • Receive Date 04 October 2024
  • Revise Date 13 November 2024
  • Accept Date 15 November 2024